nanog mailing list archives
Re: bad idea?
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:43:33 -0400
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:24:05PM -0400, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
answer it continues to use the same IP, which is routed normally. I believe this is how's Akamai load balancer works (try looking up www.yahoo.com from a name server on the left coast and on the right coast). I see absolutily nothing wrong with using DNS in this manner.
Bad example; a couple weeks ago, it was unavailable to many people for a couple of days. :-)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- C&W DoS, (continued)
- C&W DoS Ian Gulliver (Jul 05)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 05)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Brantley Jones (Jul 05)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron John Hall (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Brantley Jones (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 06)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron tony bourke (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Adrian Chadd (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Shawn McMahon (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Richard A. Steenbergen (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Matt Zimmerman (Jul 06)