nanog mailing list archives
RE: bad idea?
From: "Dmitri Krioukov" <dima () dimension net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:19:18 -0400
i plan to. -- dima.
-----Original Message----- From: Adam Rothschild [mailto:asr () latency net] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 10:24 PM To: Dmitri Krioukov Subject: Re: bad idea? On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 06:10:40PM -0400, Dmitri Krioukov wrote:i'm in the process of preparing an overview of the available techniques along with introduction of a new one, which solves a lot of headaches. it requires a feature set that is not available on any of the currently existing lb platforms, hence, for testing, i had to develop one using open source (i chose linux to make it fast (it had almost all bits in place -- check http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/)).Are you going to publish your documentation/software upon completion? I, for one, would be _very_ interested -- especially since you're working with the Linux Virtual Server Project stuffs. I'm sure many others would as well. ;) Regards, -adam
Current thread:
- Re: bad idea?, (continued)
- Re: bad idea? Adrian Chadd (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Richard A. Steenbergen (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Shawn McMahon (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Richard A. Steenbergen (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Jamie Rishaw (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Matt Zimmerman (Jul 06)
- RE: bad idea? Richard A. Steenbergen (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 06)