nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 1918
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 20:06:30 -0400
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 07:42:08PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
Unfortunately an increasing number of Internet users, with servers I might add, are now behind DSL lines that have <1500-byte MTUs..... (I'm dealing with one today that's forced to use 1496-bytes!)
I know; you spent a few minutes of your time earlier this week demanding I move my mail server to one forced to use 1492. So what are we going to do, folks; are we going to react to people who are in this situation by saying "oh, well; guess I'm walled off from you, too bad, so sad, dump that $50 connection and get a T1 or get off my Internet", or are we going to adapt?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: RFC 1918, (continued)
- Re: RFC 1918 Danny McPherson (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Bennett Todd (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Gary E. Miller (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Michael Shields (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Greg A. Woods (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Shawn McMahon (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Danny McPherson (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Greg A. Woods (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Shawn McMahon (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Bennett Todd (Jul 16)
- Re: RFC 1918 John Fraizer (Jul 16)
- Re: Path-MTU-discovery Greg A. Woods (Jul 16)
- Re: Path-MTU-discovery Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Path-MTU-discovery Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 16)
- Re: Path-MTU-discovery Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 17)
- Re: RFC 1918 Greg A. Woods (Jul 14)
- RE: RFC 1918 John Fraizer (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Todd R. Stroup (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 John Fraizer (Jul 15)