nanog mailing list archives
Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?
From: David Charlap <david.charlap () marconi com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:27:38 -0400
Karyn Ulriksen wrote:
What I was saying is that they had already set up some type of blackhole system that I was lead to believe they were doing at the router level (not mail system level). When they had us blackhole, we couldn't get past their core routers. I know your next thougt is that they just threw us into their route filter, but my understanding is that they offered a service that you subscribed to and the updated the filter on the fly.
I don't know if this what you were observing, but the MAPS RBL can be used in this capacity. See also: http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl/usage.html#BGP Of course, you'd want a different database for blocking script kiddies. -- David
Current thread:
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?, (continued)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? brett watson (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? J.D. Falk (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Kai Schlichting (Jul 06)
- RE: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? David Charlap (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Tony Mumm (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Mark Mentovai (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Shawn McMahon (Jul 06)