nanog mailing list archives
RE: Trusting BGP sessions
From: Mark Borchers <mborchers () splitrock net>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:41:06 -0600
Please do not say that in public unless you want to hasten the day when peering relationships are in the hands of sales persons and/or corporate bean counters and treated like commodities. (not to say that isn't already the case in certain places)
-----Original Message----- From: Sean Donelan [mailto:sean () donelan com] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 2:30 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Trusting BGP sessions Peering is a business decision. It is not an engineering decision nor a trust event.
Current thread:
- Trusting BGP sessions Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions David Diaz (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions David Diaz (Nov 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Trusting BGP sessions Mark Borchers (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Adrian Chadd (Nov 15)
- [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Kevin Oberman (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) gerald (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Ran Atkinson (Nov 15)