nanog mailing list archives
Re: Trusting BGP sessions
From: David Diaz <davediaz () iwcinc net>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 23:23:20 -0500
Yes. At 12:29 PM -0800 11/14/00, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Mon, 13 November 2000, David Diaz wrote:The cabal makes jokes "Officially there is no cabal." In reality the fact is that peering is a trust event. You arePeering is a business decision. It is not an engineering decision nor a trust event. Technically, can a peer BGP session do any more or less damage to your network than a customer BGP session? The protocol is identical.
Current thread:
- Trusting BGP sessions Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions David Diaz (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions David Diaz (Nov 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Trusting BGP sessions Mark Borchers (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Adrian Chadd (Nov 15)
- [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Kevin Oberman (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) gerald (Nov 15)