nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver
From: "Bryan Heitman" <bryanh () communitech net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 19:36:41 -0500
Yes Erik we use AT&T, however that is for only local circuits. We don't have any long haul with them which is probably why we're not seeing any problems... If I had to guess I would say that Kingdom City is in AT&Ts path that connects KC and St. Louis. As it is about in the center of the state directly east of KC. Best, Bryan Heitman, Vice-President CommuniTech.Net, Inc. - (800) WEB-HOST ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Korab" <adam () inetnebr com> To: "Bryan Heitman" <bryanh () communitech net> Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 7:29 PM Subject: Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 07:21:15PM -0500, Bryan Heitman wrote:UU is claiming a fiber cut, however we utilize all local carriers with numerous circuits which are all running fine.Thank you Bryan. Do you use AT&T? I was thinking that AT&T might be the "carrier" UUnet was referring to, and as I udnerstand, they were also having pretty major problems. --Adam -- Adam Korab System Administration Internet Nebraska (402) 434-8680 x 110 RFC 882 put the dot in .com, not Sun Microsystems
Current thread:
- UUnet Kansas City/Denver Adam Korab (Sep 09)
- Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver Bryan Heitman (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver Bryan Heitman (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver Bryan Heitman (Sep 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: UUnet Kansas City/Denver Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 09)