nanog mailing list archives

RE: UUnet Kansas City/Denver


From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () MHSC com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 17:57:52 -0700


My upstream is Cerf.NET, whom is apparently now owned by AT&T. They are
absorbing the CERF.NET backbone into AT&T. I have been having sporadic
connectivity for the past three weeks. Apparently, the feast isn't going
quite as smoothly as planned. I expect sporadic major outages for the
remainder of the year, from this bunch.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Heitman [mailto:bryanh () communitech net]
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 5:37 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver



Yes Erik we use AT&T, however that is for only local 
circuits.  We don't
have any long haul with them which is probably why we're not 
seeing any
problems...

If I had to guess I would say that Kingdom City is in AT&Ts path that
connects KC and St. Louis.  As it is about in the center of the state
directly east of KC.

Best,



Bryan Heitman, Vice-President
CommuniTech.Net, Inc. - (800) WEB-HOST


----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Korab" <adam () inetnebr com>
To: "Bryan Heitman" <bryanh () communitech net>
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: UUnet Kansas City/Denver


On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 07:21:15PM -0500, Bryan Heitman wrote:
UU is claiming a fiber cut, however we utilize all local 
carriers with
numerous circuits which are all running fine.

Thank you Bryan.  Do you use AT&T?  I was thinking that AT&T
might be the "carrier" UUnet was referring to, and as I 
udnerstand, they
were also having pretty major problems.

--Adam
--
Adam Korab         System Administration
Internet Nebraska      (402) 434-8680 x 110

RFC 882 put the dot in .com, not Sun Microsystems





Current thread: