nanog mailing list archives
RE: multi-homing fixes
From: "David Schwartz" <davids () webmaster com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:51:40 -0700
Patrick Greenwell wrote:
Please explain why the "basement dual-homer" should not have the same right to diversity as the "major services." And please, be specific.
The quesetion is bogus, there is no such thing as a right to have a route in my router without paying me for it. If I choose to extend that privilege to people who meet certain minimum requirements because I believe the benefits will outweight the costs, then that's *my* right. All others can pay me to do it if they want me to. Your rights end at my network. DS
Current thread:
- Re: multi-homing fixes, (continued)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Rafi Sadowsky (Aug 27)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Larry Sheldon (Aug 25)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Andreas Plesner Jacobsen - Tiscali (Aug 25)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Marshall Eubanks (Aug 26)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Tony Hain (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Roeland Meyer (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Simon Lyall (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Brian Whalen (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Patrick Greenwell (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Patrick Greenwell (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Patrick Greenwell (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David R. Conrad (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David R. Conrad (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes hardie (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes bmanning (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Dmitri Krioukov (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Simon Lyall (Aug 27)