nanog mailing list archives
Re: Automated DLR conflict detection
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 04:32:08 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Peter Galbavy wrote:
You misunderstand. Which operators will offer this (backed by some underwritten insurance) in an effort to be better than the competition ?
Buying car insurance doesn't alter the chances of your car breaking down on a long trip. Insurance doesn't alter the chances of something bad happening. Driver training, seat belts, and spare tires are things which can reduce risk. A warranty is not a substitute for due dilegence. How can you perform due dilegence on a carrier? With a car, you can open the trunk and check the spare tire. What is the best way to check a spare circuit?
Current thread:
- Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 20)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Peter Galbavy (Dec 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Marc Pierrat (Dec 21)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Peter Galbavy (Dec 23)
- OT, was Re: Automated DLR conflict detection J.D. Falk (Dec 23)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Marc Pierrat (Dec 27)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Peter Galbavy (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Peter Galbavy (Dec 23)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Kevin Gannon (Dec 29)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection David Lesher (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Howard C. Berkowitz (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Jake Khuon (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)