nanog mailing list archives
RE: Automated DLR conflict detection
From: Kevin Gannon <kgannon () lancomms ie>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 11:13:38 -0000
Guys sorry to jump in mid thread, however some of you might know how do the voice carriers handle SLA's. I know our telco voice guys seem to live on SLA's. I can not rember the last time there was any kind of widespread voice outage on an international network. Regards, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Peter Galbavy Sent: 29 December 2001 09:35 To: Sean Donelan Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Automated DLR conflict detection
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Peter Galbavy wrote:You misunderstand. Which operators will offer this (backed by some underwritten insurance) in an effort to be better than the competition ?Buying car insurance doesn't alter the chances of your car breaking down on a long trip. Insurance doesn't alter the chances of something bad happening. Driver training, seat belts, and spare tires are things which can reduce risk. A warranty is not a substitute for due dilegence. How can you perform due dilegence on a carrier? With a car, you can open the trunk and check the spare tire. What is the best way to check a spare circuit?
To me, the diverse route *is* the safety belt. If it does not work when it is supposed to, I (or my mourning relatives) will sue the car companies arse off - if the attribution for the failure rests with a design of manufacturing flaw. Safety / Seat belts are not decoration - and neither should a diverse route or protection circuit be. (Yes, my English can boldly go... but I am still waiting for the coffee to finish.) Peter ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. For more information contact postmaster () lancomms ie phone + 353 1 4093000 fax + 353 1 4093001 **********************************************************************
Current thread:
- Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 20)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Peter Galbavy (Dec 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Marc Pierrat (Dec 21)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Peter Galbavy (Dec 23)
- OT, was Re: Automated DLR conflict detection J.D. Falk (Dec 23)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Marc Pierrat (Dec 27)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Peter Galbavy (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Peter Galbavy (Dec 23)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Kevin Gannon (Dec 29)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection David Lesher (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Howard C. Berkowitz (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Jake Khuon (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection scott (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Jesper Skriver (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection EA Louie (Dec 31)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)