nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stream2
From: Clayton Fiske <clay () bloomcounty org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:10:14 -0800
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 11:06:52PM -0500, Jason Legate wrote:
Perhaps if people read the source, and compared it with the original, they would notice that there are not many operational differences, aside from the fact that this goes through the extra step of setting MSS, and calculating the correct checksum. The fact that the _all_ the packet kids can use this, doesn't unleash a deadly new tool, merely a slightly modified one. There are no optimizations in this upon the original, nor are there any real benefits. It was merely written to produce a syn generator that created packets with correct checksums and MSS.
Well, given that you've eliminated 2 useful attributes by which such an attack could be identified and/or filtered, I'd say there is an immediate benefit for the kiddies to make use of your version. And as far as releasing the code, you could at least have broken it in a couple of simple ways so that someone would have to have half a brain to make it work. -c
Current thread:
- Re: Stream2 Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Stream2 Jason Legate (Feb 24)
- Re: Stream2 jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Stream2 Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 24)
- Re: Stream2 Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: Stream2 jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Stream2 Bill Fumerola (Feb 24)
- Re: Stream2 Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Stream2 Paul Timmins (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Stream2 Jason Legate (Feb 24)
- Re: Stream2 Clayton Fiske (Feb 24)
- Re: Stream2 Alex (Feb 24)