nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET peering policy
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:48:01 -0500 (EST)
This makes it very clear for those networks that want to consolidate their operations and reduce their overall transit costs. For example: a midsized access and a midsized web host could easily meet these requirements for AS701 peering; depending on your definition of a midsized host. Deepak Jain AiNET (a hosting company) On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Jan-Ahrent Czmok wrote:
* Barrows, Jeff (jsb () aleron com) [010108 19:51]:UUNET has just posted their new peering policy: http://www.uu.net/peering/ ...even if you don't like it, you have to give them credit for finally making it available to the public without requiring an NDA. ;->Yup. A great move somehow.. Jan
Current thread:
- UUNET peering policy Barrows, Jeff (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jan-Ahrent Czmok (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Deepak Jain (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Basil Kruglov (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policyy Majdi S. Abbas (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUNET peering policy Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- OT - VPN help Stephen Burd (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help Brian W. (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help jlewis (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help jeremiah (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Rodney Joffe (Feb 24)
- OT - VPN help Stephen Burd (Feb 24)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jan-Ahrent Czmok (Feb 24)