nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET peering policy
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 05:05:31 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Hmm, what are they trying to prove? They want to own the Internet no doubt. I'd prefer to pay another like Genuity for transit to UUNET than pay them direct and feed their appetite for power.
Agreed. I am constantly telling UUNET sales monkeys that we'll gladly buy transit directly from them, as soon as they meet or beat the $ per Mb/s that we're currently getting. For now, I'll pay the 3ms "latency tax" to save 50% on the transit bill. (UUNET Sales Monkeys, do you read this list? STOP CALLING ME UNTIL YOU FIX YOUR PRICES!) --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- UUNET peering policy Barrows, Jeff (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jan-Ahrent Czmok (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Deepak Jain (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Basil Kruglov (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policyy Majdi S. Abbas (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUNET peering policy Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- OT - VPN help Stephen Burd (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help Brian W. (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help jlewis (Feb 24)
- Re: OT - VPN help jeremiah (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Rodney Joffe (Feb 24)
- OT - VPN help Stephen Burd (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jeff . Hodges (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy smd (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy smd (Feb 24)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jan-Ahrent Czmok (Feb 24)