nanog mailing list archives
Re: GRC rides again...
From: "David Howe" <DaveHowe () gmx co uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:41:51 +0100
Yes, but my first question was wrt QoS. Would it do any good?
I doubt it - unless you have a more complex definition of QoS than I do, it should just ensure he gets his spoofed packet storm more reliably.....
Current thread:
- GRC rides again... David Howe (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... Chris Rapier (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... Tim Wilde (Jul 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: GRC rides again... Roeland Meyer (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... Roland Dobbins (Jul 02)
- RE: GRC rides again... Mike Batchelor (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... Scott Francis (Jul 02)
- RE: GRC rides again... Roeland Meyer (Jul 02)
- RE: GRC rides again... Dave Israel (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... David Howe (Jul 02)
- RE: GRC rides again... Roeland Meyer (Jul 02)
- RE: GRC rides again... Ron Buchalski (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... Ron Buchalski (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... Stephen Kowalchuk (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... David Howe (Jul 02)
- RE: GRC rides again... Benny Fischer (Jul 05)
- Re: GRC rides again... auto261850 (Jul 02)
- Re: GRC rides again... Owen DeLong (Jul 02)
- RE: GRC rides again... Roeland Meyer (Jul 02)
- RE: GRC rides again... Roeland Meyer (Jul 02)