nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall () ehsco com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 15:44:35 -0700
this is certainly not the cleanest way to settle a contract dispute,
but it is a damn good way to invite regulation. "The stability of the Internet is a national concern" will be the sound-bite. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
Current thread:
- C&W Peering Moe Allen (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Moe Allen (Jun 06)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: C&W Peering Sean Donelan (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Simon Lockhart (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Chris Adams (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering E.B. Dreger (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Eric A. Hall (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering David Schwartz (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering shane (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering shane (Jun 05)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering ken harris. (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Mike Hughes (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering John Starta (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)