nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering
From: Travis Pugh <tpugh () shore net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 18:55:11 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Eric A. Hall wrote:
this is certainly not the cleanest way to settle a contract dispute,but it is a damn good way to invite regulation. "The stability of the Internet is a national concern" will be the sound-bite.
Yuck. I was interviewed by the GAO a few months back (they wanted to talk to little players about the transit market) and was worrying that the feds wanted to mandate interconnection policies in one form or another ... we certainly don't want to encourage that kind of behavior. However, it seems reasonable that if we can't regulate ourselves someone else is going to do it for us. -travis
-- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
Current thread:
- Re: C&W Peering, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Moe Allen (Jun 06)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Sean Donelan (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Simon Lockhart (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Chris Adams (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering E.B. Dreger (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Eric A. Hall (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering David Schwartz (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering shane (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering shane (Jun 05)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering ken harris. (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Mike Hughes (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering John Starta (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)