nanog mailing list archives

Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue

From: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:43:19 -0400 (EDT)


On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 04:32:45PM -0700, Sean Donelan wrote:


Does the 10% number mean C&W's network reach has shrunk, or that a
growing number of networks are multihomed?


I'm gonna go with "PSI made up a number that sounded good".

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177  (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA  B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)

Current thread:

PSI statement on C&W peering issue Sean Donelan (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Steve Meuse (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Christian Nielsen (Jun 04)
- RE: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Daniel Golding (Jun 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Morris, Gary (Jun 05)
  - Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Jeff Ogden (Jun 05)
    - Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 05)