nanog mailing list archives
Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 13:25:52 -0400
At 10:50 AM 6/5/2001 -0400, Jeff Ogden wrote: >And what I find alarming about this is that we purchase transit >service from C&W and they no longer seem to be providing transit >service that allows us to reach PSINet either directly or indirectly >anymore. We've complained to C&W. They haven't responded yet. I am >hoping that we don't need to get out our contract and read the fine >print, but it may in fact come to that. (We are multihomed so we have >some options, but that doesn't change anything in terms of the >service we receive from C&W.)Is there a C&W customer out there who can get his/her SLA easily and find out what kind of service credits are allowed under this type of situation?
If the answer is not "zero", that might limit future such actions on C&W's part - or at least push them not to do this again. If the answer is zero, well, what is to stop them from de-peering other networks?
Then again, if the answer is "zero", it might have a negative impact on their sales. :)
> -Jeff Ogden TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- PSI statement on C&W peering issue Sean Donelan (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Steve Meuse (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Christian Nielsen (Jun 04)
- RE: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Daniel Golding (Jun 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Morris, Gary (Jun 05)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Jeff Ogden (Jun 05)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 05)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Jeff Ogden (Jun 05)