nanog mailing list archives
Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?)
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 10:19:37 -0700
In case this is unclear, AboveNet was the first to do 95th percentile
i did not know abovenet was around in '89-90. thanks for the info.
Current thread:
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame, (continued)
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame James Thomason (Jun 03)
- Measuring traffic (WAS: 95th Percentile = Lame) Charles Scott (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 02)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Geoff Huston (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Nipper, Arnold (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Greg A. Woods (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) George Michaelson (Jun 07)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Joe Abley (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Paul Vixie (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Paul A Vixie (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) jlewis (Jun 03)