nanog mailing list archives
Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 13:43:26 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
UUNet bills for the MAXIMIUM 95th percentile on inbound OR outbound, whichever is higher, as does AboveNet, and probably the majority of networks trying to be like UUNet.In case this is unclear, AboveNet was the first to do 95th percentile, and UUNet was the first of those who have since followed in Dave Rand's footsteps.
Huh? My recollection is that UU was doing 95th back in 94 or so. I may be nutz, but I thought Above was born around 96 or so.
Current thread:
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?), (continued)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Geoff Huston (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Nipper, Arnold (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Greg A. Woods (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) George Michaelson (Jun 07)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Joe Abley (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Paul Vixie (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Paul A Vixie (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) jlewis (Jun 03)