nanog mailing list archives
Re: new.net
From: richb () pioneer ci net
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:05:50 -0500 (EST)
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Whats international trademark+patent arrangements say about this? See, .com is not all US-registered, and so if you were going to do something like this, where do non-US people fit in here?
I think that's precisely the issue at hand. How does one administer a global flat name-space, given the lack of any global entity with the authority to do so? Right now, lawyers get paid big bucks by international firms to protect a trademark or company name in a multitude of jurisdictions. -rich
Current thread:
- Re: new.net, (continued)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Charles Scott (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Charles Scott (Mar 10)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net David Schwartz (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Josh Richards (Mar 10)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Martin Hannigan (Mar 08)
- RE: new.net Ken Eddings (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Shawn McMahon (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Ian Cooper (Mar 09)