nanog mailing list archives

Re: Namespace conflicts

From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 06:49:52 -0500

On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 05:27:20PM -0800, Tony Hain wrote:

More precisely, the courts started getting involved as soon as
first-come-first-serve stopped working fine.


No, someone involved the courts when they were second, and the courts
didn't understand so they didn't smack it back at the lawyers "dismissed
with prejudice".

DNS didn't make the mess, the courts did.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play, (continued)
- - - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Vadim Antonov (Mar 07)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Steve Sobol (Mar 07)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play David Charlap (Mar 08)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Shawn McMahon (Mar 08)
    - Namespace conflicts bob bownes (Mar 08)
    - Re: Namespace conflicts David Lesher (Mar 08)
    - Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Mar 08)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts Pim van Riezen (Mar 08)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Mar 08)
    - RE: Namespace conflicts Tony Hain (Mar 08)
    - Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Mar 09)
    - Message not available
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Ben Browning (Mar 08)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Steve Sobol (Mar 07)
  - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Simon Higgs (Mar 07)
  - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Andrea Abrahamsen (Mar 08)