Re: Namespace conflicts

[Tom Lettington <tom () tfl net>]

ISI delegated the registration of .US domains a long time ago.

See http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/us-domain-delegated.txt


At 09:21 AM 3/9/2001 -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:


> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:10:09AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin mailed:
> > > In my area of NJ, virtually every town's "obvious" .com domain names 
> were
> > > grabbed by one of two competing would-be service providers.  They had
> > > absolutely no town-specific content -- but if the town wanted a Web
> > > site, they had no choice but to deal with these folks.  I have no major
> > > problem with first-come, first-served *productive* use of a domain name,
> > > but frankly, that's not where the problem has been.  The problem has
> > > been speculators and cybersquatters.
> >
> > Uh, why couldn't the town just use <name>.nj.us or whatever the city 
> specific
> > code was long ago and far way.
>
> No.  However, they could use ci.<name>.nj.us, and that's where I usually go
> if I'm looking for a particular city's web site.
>
> The reason for this distinction is to support things like:
>
>         ci.alameda.ca.us        City of Alameda
>         co.alameda.ca.us        County of Alameda
>         joesshoes.alameda.ca.us Joe's Shoe Shop in Alameda, CA
>
> etc.  There's an RFC that spells all this out (1680 comes to mind, but not
> sure that's the right number).
>
>
> Owen