nanog mailing list archives

RE: Namespace conflicts

From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:05:16 -0800


Actually, the courts aren't well engaged right now. They've been
short-circuted by the UDRP. UDRP arbitrators are NOT courts.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:smcmahon () eiv com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:16 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Namespace conflicts


On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 02:51:30PM -0800, bob bownes wrote:

On the other hand, if my TV let me type in "CNN" and it

came back with

the right channel, that would scale beautifully as long

as nobody else

was dumb enough to name their channel CNN.


Or dumb enough to name it IBM...Therein lies part of the problem.


I don't see that it's a problem.  First-come first-served worked fine
until the courts got involved.

Current thread:

Re: Namespace conflicts, (continued)
- Re: Namespace conflicts Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
  - Re: Namespace conflicts Tom Lettington (Mar 09)
    - Re: Namespace conflicts Joe Provo (Mar 09)
  - Re: Namespace conflicts Clayton Fiske (Mar 09)
- RE: Namespace conflicts Mark Borchers (Mar 09)
- Re: Namespace conflicts Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 09)
  - Re: Namespace conflicts Saint skullY the Dazed (Mar 09)
    - Re: Namespace conflicts Aaron L. Meehan (Mar 09)
    - Re: Namespace conflicts Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
  - Re: Namespace conflicts Stephen Griffin (Mar 10)
- RE: Namespace conflicts Roeland Meyer (Mar 10)
  - Re: Namespace conflicts Henry R. Linneweh (Mar 10)