nanog mailing list archives
RE: QOS or more bandwidth
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Whenever I did the cost of deploying and managing fancy QoS > and compared it with the cost of getting and managing more capacity, > it was always MUCH MUCH cheaper to get and manage more capacity > than to mess with more QoS. We did one VoIP network deployment, and I tried each of the different QoS services in IOS at that time (about 18 months ago) both in the lab and in the field, and more bandwidth was the answer then. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Frank Coluccio (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Ukyo Kuonji (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Irwin Lazar (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth bmanning (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Bill Woodcock (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Eric Whitehill (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Greg Maxwell (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Glen Turner (May 31)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- More BW, Less Taxes bmanning (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Simon Lockhart (May 29)
- Re: More BW, Less Taxes Alex Rubenstein (May 29)