nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!?
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () opaltelecom co uk>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 09:08:40 +0100 (BST)
Another possible disadvantage with 'free' peering is you may have a harder time getting the larger companies to deal with issues that arise surrounding that peering. They may feel they have no financial incentive to worry about it, and you really have no contractual leverage to get, for example, response time guarantees.
Isnt the financial issue and management overhead less (relatively) for a large company with a large well ordered NOC than that of a small one? So their only excuse remains the one that they 'think your too small to care' Steve
Current thread:
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!?, (continued)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Albert Meyer (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Paul Vixie (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Peter van Dijk (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Joseph T. Klein (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Simon Lyall (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Peter van Dijk (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? David Schwartz (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? hardie (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Jeff Mcadams (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? David Schwartz (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Stephen J. Wilcox (May 08)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Stephen Stuart (May 07)
- RE: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Mike Leber (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Paul Vixie (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Alex Bligh (May 08)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? Charles Scott (May 07)
- Re: Cable & Wireless "de-peering"?!? John Payne (May 06)