nanog mailing list archives
Re: win95 and IEAK6.0
From: Paul Timmins <paul () timmins net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:55:10 -0500
heh. It's been time for about 2-3 years now, easy. Where were you before now? -Paul At 02:42 PM 11/21/2001, you wrote:
It appears that without telling anyone Microsoft decided the Internet Explorer Admin Kit version 6.0 which generates a custom IE web browser for ISP's would no longer support Windows 95. I do not know about the rest of you however, I have many Windows 95 users still signing on to my service. I think it is time to let Microsoft know our displeasure about this clear abuse of their monopoly position. Once someone else confirms this behavior, I intend to raise a stink with the national news media, the federal government and the nine states that are still suing Microsoft. Bill Larson Network Administrator Compu-Net Enterprises
Current thread:
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Paul Timmins (Nov 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 James Smith (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Matt Levine (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Joshua Coombs (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Patrick Muldoon (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Joshua Coombs (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Patrick Muldoon (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Dave Stewart (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Vivien M. (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Dave Stewart (Nov 21)