nanog mailing list archives
Re: win95 and IEAK6.0
From: Dave Stewart <dbs () ntrnet net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:45:19 -0500
At 02:51 PM 11/21/2001, Bill Larson wrote:
users they must upgrade their computers to use my service those users will simply find another internet service.
OK, I don't get this at all. Why would existing users need to run IE6 at all?For that matter, why would anyone *need* to run IE6? It's not a terribly complicated matter to create the dialup connection in Win95... geez, how long did most of us go without even the cute wizards?
I do understand that you want to provide a "branded" copy of IE to your users - but I'd guess you've already provided that to your existing users, and frankly, the license notwithstanding, I don't see the software cops comin' down on you because you continue to distribute your old IE5 branded browser to Windows 95 users.
Of course, I'm not a lawyer...If I were in that situation, I'd do just that - make up the new IE6 for users with machines/operating systems that can handle it, and keep the old IE5 for those who can't.
Current thread:
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Paul Timmins (Nov 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 James Smith (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Matt Levine (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Joshua Coombs (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Patrick Muldoon (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Joshua Coombs (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Patrick Muldoon (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Dave Stewart (Nov 21)
- RE: win95 and IEAK6.0 Vivien M. (Nov 21)
- Re: win95 and IEAK6.0 Dave Stewart (Nov 21)