nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verio Peering Question
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 23:22:10 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Alex Bligh wrote:
There is much evidence to suggest the free market is good at sorting things like this out. Currently, however, we have misattribution of costs.
SMD suggested this a long time ago, for routes in general (i.e. not just long ones). He's right (at least if measured over a long enough time window :-p )
Yes, this could be interesting. I announce one route to UUNET, but they send me over 800 (not counting transit). So that should generate some income for me... I don't think it would be very hard to identify who should pay, but it might be difficult to decide who should receive the money.
Current thread:
- RE: Verio Peering Question Daniel Golding (Oct 01)
- RE: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Oct 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Verio Peering Question Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question John A. Tamplin (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Peter Galbavy (Oct 03)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 03)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Marshall Eubanks (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)