nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verio Peering Question
From: Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 23:36:11 +0100
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Alex Bligh wrote:Absolutely, assuming UUnet were willing to peer with you, and at that rate for route exchange. Terms to be negotiated in the free market.In that case, we already have the system in place. It just turns out that the negotiated rate per prefix is $0.
Or 'not at any price' in the case of refused peerings. Or at $$$ in the case of paid for peerings. And with no distinction drawn between length/usefulness/CIDRity of prefixes. However, it has been suggested that the ternary nature of this relationship is insufficiently granular for people to exchange the routes they want. -- Alex Bligh Personal Capacity
Current thread:
- RE: Verio Peering Question Daniel Golding (Oct 01)
- RE: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Oct 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Verio Peering Question Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question John A. Tamplin (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Peter Galbavy (Oct 03)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 03)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Marshall Eubanks (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Oct 02)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Alex Bligh (Oct 03)
- Re: Verio Peering Question E.B. Dreger (Oct 02)