nanog mailing list archives
Re: 214/8 and 215/8
From: Chrisy Luke <chrisy () flix net>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 03:08:32 +0000
Philip Smith wrote (on Nov 01):
I seem to remember that they were exchanged for 49/8 and 50/8. Seems a bit odd that this was done, and I'd love to know what the technical or operational or political advantage was. Maybe the IANA folks can shed more light?
OT: Perhaps the military hasn't come across the "ip classless" (or equivalent for other antiquated vendors) directive? Chris. -- == chris () easynet net T: +44 845 333 0122 == Global IP Network Engineering, Easynet Group PLC F: +44 845 333 0122
Current thread:
- 214/8 and 215/8 Sean M. Doran (Oct 31)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Brian Whalen (Oct 31)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 jlewis (Oct 31)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Philip Smith (Oct 31)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Chrisy Luke (Oct 31)
- Re: 214/8 and 215/8 Brian Whalen (Oct 31)