nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verio Peering Question
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 16:14:39 -0700
my point is that not everyone wants to multihome.That's what the people who killed A6 said, too.
no. they said o it is not clear that a6 helps stable scalable multi-homing o no one could show a plan for stable scalable multi-homing other than current v4 style, which is weak on the scalable o and it would be a damned shame if a mediocre dns hack limited the design space for stable scalable multi-homing solutions randy
Current thread:
- Re: Verio Peering Question, (continued)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Sep 28)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Schultz (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Vixie (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Sam Thomas (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jeff Mcadams (Sep 28)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Schultz (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Vixie (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question E.B. Dreger (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Paul Vixie (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Randy Bush (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question E.B. Dreger (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question E.B. Dreger (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 30)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Jared Mauch (Sep 30)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Pete Kruckenberg (Sep 29)
- Re: Verio Peering Question Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 29)