nanog mailing list archives
RE: Lack of Security
From: "Mathias Körber" <mathias () koerber org>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:22:41 +0800
| What if we were to increase the security of the pilots (basically the | cabin door) and then place some type of secure "sleeping gas" in the | cabin that could be triggered by the pilots? Now, I know this sounds | like something out of a James Bond movie, but in our short discussion, | we could not think of a downside. Comments? 1. Medical problems some passengers may have with the gas? While it might be a reasonable tradeoff to lose a passenger or two if the whole plane (and whatever it may hit) can be saved, making that determination that early (at the first sign of an hijack attempt) would likely be impossible. 2. Gas masks
Current thread:
- Re: Totally OT, sorry; was (Re: Lack of Security), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Totally OT, sorry; was (Re: Lack of Security) Dave Stewart (Sep 13)
- Re: Totally OT, sorry; was (Re: Lack of Security) bmanning (Sep 13)
- RE: Lack of Security Mathias Körber (Sep 12)
- Re: Lack of Security Kevin Day (Sep 12)
- Re: Lack of Security Matthew S. Hallacy (Sep 12)
- Re: Lack of Security Todd Suiter (Sep 13)
- Re: Lack of Security Joel Baker (Sep 13)
- Re: Lack of Security John Payne (Sep 14)
- RE: Lack of Security Scott A Crosby (Sep 13)