nanog mailing list archives
Re: genuity - any good?
From: Aditya <aditya () mighty grot org>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:55:46 -0700
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:50:20PM -0700, Roy wrote:
Registering is not "bad", its just not beneficial. Given that the routes I want to announce are within my assigned range, why is it a good thing to register them? If the transit provider always add entries when I ask for them, it seems to be very little benefit..
have you asked them to add entries for prefixes that don't "belong" to you? Adi
Current thread:
- Re: genuity - any good?, (continued)
- Re: genuity - any good? Anthony D Cennami (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Hank Nussbacher (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Neil J. McRae (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Hank Nussbacher (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Neil J. McRae (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Simon Lyall (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Aditya (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? David Schwartz (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 12)
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Leo Bicknell (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)
- limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 13)
- Re: limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) German Martinez (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 15)