nanog mailing list archives
Re: genuity - any good?
From: Mark Kent <mark () noc mainstreet net>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
On the leaking more specific routes topic (ip prefix lists): I've verified that Above.Net lets me do this and Genuity does not. But Genuity has said, today, that they are working on doing it. To address Sean's point about mistakes turning one /16 into a zillion entries, is there any way to allow only some specified maximum number of routes from a bgp neighbor? I know that I'ld be happy if my upstreams gave me a buffer of, say, 10 entries above my typical number of aggregates. -mark
Current thread:
- Re: genuity - any good?, (continued)
- Re: genuity - any good? Neil J. McRae (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Neil J. McRae (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Simon Lyall (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Aditya (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? David Schwartz (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 12)
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Leo Bicknell (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)
- limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 13)
- Re: limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) German Martinez (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 15)
- Re: genuity - any good? matthew zeier (Apr 12)