nanog mailing list archives
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
From: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme () multicasttech com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:26:49 -0400
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:08:16 -0700 Beckmeyer <beck () pacbell net> wrote:
Marshall et al,
Dear JB; 1.) Dare I suggest that you use IPv6 ? It should make a great NAT. 2.) If you are interested in having content put on your wireless devices I would like to talk off line. Regards Marshall Eubanks
It's a lack of IP Address Space - and the numbers I gave - 10's of thousands are probably a bit on the small side - in short order it will be multiples of 100,000 IP addresses. To start with, I'm willing to think in terms of 10's of thousands spread over a handful of "POPs". The application is GPRS (aka 2.5/3G cellular) and each Internet connected user or some major subset of them will likely wind up with an address on their mobile device. - JB
Current thread:
- Large ISPs doing NAT? Beckmeyer (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Marshall Eubanks (Apr 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Beckmeyer (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Marshall Eubanks (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? David Conrad (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Bill Woodcock (Apr 30)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Tony Rall (Apr 30)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Apr 30)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas (Apr 30)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? kevin graham (Apr 30)