nanog mailing list archives
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
From: David Conrad <david.conrad () nominum com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:46:51 -0700
On 4/29/02 9:08 AM, "Beckmeyer" <beck () pacbell net> wrote:
Marshall et al, It's a lack of IP Address Space
Last I looked there was plenty of address space.
- and the numbers I gave - 10's of thousands are probably a bit on the small side - in short order it will be multiples of 100,000 IP addresses. To start with, I'm willing to think in terms of 10's of thousands spread over a handful of "POPs".
All you need do is document usage according to your RIR's allocation policies and you'll get the address space you justify.
The application is GPRS (aka 2.5/3G cellular) and each Internet connected user or some major subset of them will likely wind up with an address on their mobile device.
There have already been numerous discussions between the RIRs and the GSM association(s) regarding address allocations for GPRS. Have you asked your RIR about this? Rgds, -drc
Current thread:
- Large ISPs doing NAT? Beckmeyer (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Marshall Eubanks (Apr 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Beckmeyer (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Marshall Eubanks (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? David Conrad (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Bill Woodcock (Apr 30)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas (Apr 29)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Tony Rall (Apr 30)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Apr 30)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas (Apr 30)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? kevin graham (Apr 30)