nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting )
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden () geek net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:51:05 -0500 (CDT)
It depends a lot on your topgraphy. For example, if you have a specific city/region aggregation center, your redundant boarder routers for that city are probably also RRs. Those boarders peer with your boarders in other cities as well as your intra-region routers. Of course, this is just one way. Trying not to start a religious war. On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Robert A. Hayden wrote:Um. Set up more than one reflector....So how many is enough? I would think 3 is a minimum to come close to the reliability/redundancy of OSPF. -Ralph
Current thread:
- RE: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- RE: AT&T NYC NAIDOO Kesva FTLD/IAP (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Brian Wallingford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Peter van Dijk (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Chris Woodfield (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ross Chandler (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Kurtis Lindqvist (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)