nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T NYC
From: Peter van Dijk <peter () dataloss nl>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 20:57:49 +0200
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:09:54PM -0400, alex () yuriev com wrote:
Has anybody mentioned the benefits of ISIS as an IGP to them.Link-state protocols are evil, and when they break, they *really* break. I still do not see a compeling argument for not using BGP as your IGP.
Slow convergence. Greetz, Peter -- MegaBIT - open air networking event - http://www.megabit.nl/
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- Re: AT&T NYC Spencer . Wood (Aug 28)
- RE: AT&T NYC Frank Scalzo (Aug 28)
- RE: AT&T NYC Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 28)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 28)
- Re: AT&T NYC Me (Aug 28)
- RE: AT&T NYC Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 28)
- Re: AT&T NYC Petri Helenius (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC NAIDOO Kesva FTLD/IAP (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Brian Wallingford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Peter van Dijk (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Chris Woodfield (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ross Chandler (Aug 29)