nanog mailing list archives

Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes


From: Omachonu Ogali <nanog () missnglnk com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:29:48 -0400


On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 10:16:41PM +0000, bmanning () karoshi com wrote:

On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 bmanning () karoshi com wrote:

Typical response: You're not our customer, who are you?
I'm Omachonu Ogali with XYZ Networks, and I'd like to speak to
a network engineer regarding a routing problem.
  Hum.  I take ~4 calls each day for things that are some other
  ISPs problem.  Folks are -politely- told that the issues
  are either with their ISP or someone upstream of their ISP.
  When they get pushy, I offer them a service contract. 99.999%
  (hey Sean, there are your five 9's!) of them then choose to
  work with thier ISPs.  I suspect that you have more than enough
  clue to never have to give me a call, but if you do, be prepared
  to be re-directed... :)

I hope you pay better attention on the phone then you do on lists. :)

The point was calling up the upstream of the AS who is generating bogus
routes.  The upstream of the caller is not at all involved.


      But the upstream of the caller is involved.  They passed
      the route(s) on, no?

--bill

Not necessarily, I could be the victim of a leak calling up
an ISP to report it. Or some bored person connected to
route-server.* constantly checking prefixes.
-- 
Omachonu Ogali
missnglnk () informationwave net
http://www.informationwave.net


Current thread: