nanog mailing list archives
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 22:51:37 +0000 (UCT)
The point was calling up the upstream of the AS who is generating bogus routes. The upstream of the caller is not at all involved.But the upstream of the caller is involved. They passed the route(s) on, no? --billNot necessarily, I could be the victim of a leak calling up an ISP to report it. Or some bored person connected to route-server.* constantly checking prefixes.
you either generated the bogus route yourself or you heard it from one of your direct neighbors. there is no other way for you to hear the route. Now you can -look- for what might be bogons (from your perspective) in other places in the net (route-server.*) or some random LG. But just because a route is there does not mean it shows up on your border. And routes that show up in those places are "nominally" interesting only from the perspective of "...are my routes propogating..." If there IS a legit.bogon that shows up on your border, then the -only- people who can do anything about it are: ) yourself. * ) your peer. (*) or you can contract with me at the usual and customary rates to config your routers for you. It may take both of you to provide the types of "corrective lenses) to give you the view you think you want, but it is an affrontery to "jump over" your providers to pester other ISPs that you have no business pestering. The routes they exchange among themselves is their business.
Current thread:
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes, (continued)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes John M. Brown (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Alex Rubenstein (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Daniel Senie (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Simon Lockhart (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Greg Maxwell (Aug 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes David Conrad (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles (Aug 06)
- RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 06)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability Ralph Doncaster (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability John M. Brown (Aug 08)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Patrick (Aug 07)