nanog mailing list archives
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
From: Larry Rosenman <ler () lerctr org>
Date: 21 Aug 2002 14:38:31 -0500
What about individuals that run their own mail servers? (E.G. me).? On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 14:28, Derek Samford wrote:
I really like this. A sort of IRR for mail servers. Maybe when registered it could even check if the server was an open relay, and not allow those servers to be registered until properly configured. Any thoughts? Derek-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On BehalfOfMark Segal Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 3:12 PM To: 'Robert Blayzor'; nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.orgIt's almost to the point to where mail servers need their own "registrar", sort of the way domains are tracked now, track mail servers. Give mail server admins the option to accept mail from registered mail servers only or from any mail server. Of course there would need to be a ramp up period, like six months to a year, to make sure all of your mail servers are registered. And of course one should only be able to register mail servers if the IP space is actually SWIP to them. If the IP space is NOT SWIP, it would need to be registered by the customer ISP or via owners rwhois server. Just my $.02; for what it's worth....Really good idea (no sarcasm, I actually like it).. But what stops spammers from registering their mail server?..Ie.. 1) Get a dsl account 2) Ips get swipped to you 3) Register the server 4) SPAM 5) Apologize, get a second chance 6) get booted off 7) Call the next ISP with a zero install 8) Rinse and repeat. Regards, Mark -- Mark Segal Director, Data Services Futureway Communications Inc. Tel: (905)326-1570
-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler () lerctr org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
Current thread:
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, (continued)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org JC Dill (Aug 22)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Vivien M. (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Petri Helenius (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Dave Israel (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Paul Vixie (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Aug 22)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Larry Rosenman (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Larry Rosenman (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Peter E. Fry (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Ian Cooper (Aug 22)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Aug 22)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Aug 22)