nanog mailing list archives
Re: White House to Propose System for Wide Monitoring of Internet (fwd)
From: blitz <blitz () macronet net>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:51:12 -0500
Methinks they'll try the Russian SORM model. Since this country is hell bent on establishing a police-state, this seems logical. Why not use the one thats been developed?
http://www.libertarium.ru/eng/sorm/
> > :[This just jumped into the operational arena. Are you prepared > :with the router port for John Poindexter's vacuum? What changes > :will you need to make? What will they cost? Who will pay?]
Current thread:
- Re: White House to Propose System for Wide Monitoring of Internet (fwd), (continued)
- Re: White House to Propose System for Wide Monitoring of Internet (fwd) Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 23)
- Re: White House to Propose System for Wide Monitoring of Internet (fwd) Stephen Sprunk (Dec 23)
- Re: White House to Propose System for Wide Monitoring of Internet (fwd) batz (Dec 23)
- Re: White House to Propose System for Wide Monitoring of Internet (fwd) Richard Forno (Dec 23)
- Whoops! (re: WH network monitoring plan response) Richard Forno (Dec 24)
- Re: Whoops! (re: WH network monitoring plan response) Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 24)
- Re: Whoops! (re: WH network monitoring plan response) Marshall Eubanks (Dec 24)
- Acceptable Losses (was Re: Whoops! (re: WH network monitoring plan response)) Sean Donelan (Dec 24)
- RE: White House to Propose System for Wide Monitoring of Internet(fwd) err, make that (fud) Al Rowland (Dec 24)
- Re: White House to Propose System for Wide Monitoring of Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 20)
- Message not available
- Re: White House to Propose System for Wide Monitoring of Internet (fwd) blitz (Dec 20)