nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management
From: brandon () rd bbc co uk (BrandonButterworth)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:34:02 GMT
The bottom line is that expanding the name space with additional TLDs solves this problem. Then "Two (or more) companies don't *HAVE* to fight for identical flat space" - because they are each given unique space. Duh!
That was nice until someone decided that they're really trade marks and caused legal people to run around registering in each TLD (you have to collect them all or you're not defending your mark), after that new TLDs were just a license to print money. What a waste. brandon
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management, (continued)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Ariel Biener (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management David Conrad (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 27)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Ariel Biener (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- RE: Tauzin-Dingell (was ICANN) Daniel Lark (Feb 26)
- Re: Tauzin-Dingell (was ICANN) Patrick (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 27)