nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management
From: David Conrad <david.conrad () nominum com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:13:46 -0800
Simon, On 2/26/02 11:49 AM, "Simon Higgs" <simon () higgs com> wrote:
That's the point. Two (or more) companies don't *HAVE* to fight for identical flat space.
Most people want to be able to get to the same server when they type the same domain name from two different places. Sorry this doesn't conform with the way you want things to work. Rgds, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management, (continued)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management vince (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 26)
- Message not available
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management vince (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management David Conrad (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 27)
- RE: Tauzin-Dingell (was ICANN) Daniel Lark (Feb 26)
- Re: Tauzin-Dingell (was ICANN) Patrick (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 27)