nanog mailing list archives

Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management


From: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <nanog () adns net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:42:14 -0600


What right does the government have in preventing people from having
multiple domains and trading/selling them? Thats none of your (or)
the government's business.

----- Original Message -----
From: <vince () penguin-power com>
To: "Vadim Antonov" <avg () exigengroup com>
Cc: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:22 AM
Subject: Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management




4) exponential fee increments for registering domains with the same
   payer's physical address and/or name.

Yeah so I don't like this suggestion at all. What if a company has several
business units each with its own domain name, with the same address, and
with a shared accounting department. Or an ISP that offers to pay for its
customers domain if they prepay for a year. Or someone like me who owns
several domains?
Nope I really dont' like this suggestion, the other ones seem to be more
thought out.

-Vince




Current thread: