nanog mailing list archives

Re: verio arrogance

From: "Peter E. Fry" <pfry () swbell net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:57:31 -0500


Brian Wallingford wrote:
[...]

That said, their current policy of refusing to accept de-aggregated
prefixes from peers (while accepting such from paying customers) makes
perfect sense, IMHO.  Not arrogant, just a smart & reasonable business
decision.


  Interesting.  Looking around, it seems that Verio allocates /24 and
larger (all I saw offhand were /24s and /23s) address blocks for
customers from the Class C space.  Can't fault 'em for consistency.

Peter E. Fry

Current thread:

Re: verio arrogance, (continued)
- Re: verio arrogance Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 15)
  - Re: verio arrogance Marshall Eubanks (Jul 15)
  - Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 15)
    - RE: verio arrogance Daniel Golding (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance up (Jul 15)
  - Re: verio arrogance Austin Schutz (Jul 17)
    - Re: verio arrogance Brian Wallingford (Jul 17)
    - china telecom noc contact ? Anthony Pardini (Jul 17)
    - Re: china telecom noc contact ? German Martinez (Jul 17)
    - Re: verio arrogance Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jul 18)
    - Re: verio arrogance Peter E. Fry (Jul 18)
    - Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 18)
    - Re: verio arrogance Mark Kent (Jul 18)
    - Re: verio arrogance Stephen Griffin (Jul 26)
    - Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 26)
    - Re: verio arrogance Stephen Griffin (Jul 26)
    - Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 26)
    - RE: verio arrogance Phil Rosenthal (Jul 26)
    - RE: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
    - solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] Joe Provo (Jul 27)
    - Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)

(Thread continues...)