nanog mailing list archives
Re: verio arrogance
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:45:35 -0400 (EDT)
That said, their current policy of refusing to accept de-aggregated prefixes from peers (while accepting such from paying customers) makes perfect sense, IMHO. Not arrogant, just a smart & reasonable business decision.
I have one downstream ISP customer that explicitly asked for "full BGP routes" to be written into the contract. Why Verio's customer's wouldn't want full routes makes no business sense to me. However a NANOG list subscriber was kind enough to help me get past Verio's NOC monkeys and get their filters updated to allow my announcements. -Ralph
Current thread:
- Re: verio arrogance, (continued)
- Re: verio arrogance Marshall Eubanks (Jul 15)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 15)
- RE: verio arrogance Daniel Golding (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance up (Jul 15)
- Re: verio arrogance Austin Schutz (Jul 17)
- Re: verio arrogance Brian Wallingford (Jul 17)
- china telecom noc contact ? Anthony Pardini (Jul 17)
- Re: china telecom noc contact ? German Martinez (Jul 17)
- Re: verio arrogance Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Peter E. Fry (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Mark Kent (Jul 18)
- Re: verio arrogance Stephen Griffin (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Stephen Griffin (Jul 26)
- Re: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 26)
- RE: verio arrogance Phil Rosenthal (Jul 26)
- RE: verio arrogance Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] Joe Provo (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] Ralph Doncaster (Jul 27)
- Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something about arrogance] Andy Dills (Jul 27)
- Re: verio arrogance Austin Schutz (Jul 17)