nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: SPEWS?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:41:22 -0400
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:25:05 EDT, Richard Welty <rwelty () averillpark net> said:
actually, i think Valdis was alluding to the Paetec fiasco with Monsterhut.
Correct.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: SPEWS?, (continued)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Benjamin P. Grubin (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Benjamin P. Grubin (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Benjamin P. Grubin (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Sandy Harris (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 20)
- Re: Re[2]: SPEWS? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re[3]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 20)
- Re[3]: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Sandy Harris (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Jim Segrave (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Peter Galbavy (Jun 21)
- Re: attention network operators who are listed in blacklists! your problem is with the blockers, not the blacklist managers! (was: SPEWS?) Greg A. Woods (Jun 21)
- Re: attention network operators who are listed in blacklists! your problem is with the blockers, not the blacklist managers! (was: SPEWS?) Peter Galbavy (Jun 22)
- Re: attention network operators who are listed in blacklists! your problem is with the blockers, not the blacklist managers! (was: SPEWS?) Bruce Campbell (Jun 24)